Cambridge professor Michael Kelly weighs in on “deniers” and climate change: “science has been consistently over-egged to produce alarm.”
Professor Michael Kelly is the Prince Philip Professor of Technology in the University of Cambridge and a Professorial Fellow at Trinity Hall. He was also Chief Scientific Advisor to the Department for Communities and Local Government, and a non-executive director of the Laird Group plc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Professor Michael Kelly Writes To The Times
Climate orthodoxy
Sir, Andrew Motion (report, Feb 23) is correct to castigate climate change deniers, but he is profoundly mistaken in linking all those who oppose the current climate science orthodoxy into one group. The interpretation of the observational science has been consistently over-egged to produce alarm. All real-world data over the past 20 years has shown the climate models to be exaggerating the likely impacts — if the models cannot account for the near term, why should I trust them in the long term?
I am most worried by the billions of pounds being misinvested and lost as a consequence. Look out to sea at the end of 2015 and see how many windmills are not turning and you will get my point: there are already 14,000 abandoned windmills onshore in the US. Premature technology deployment is thoroughly bad engineering, and my taxes are subsidising it against my will and professional judgment.
Professor Michael Kelly
~~~~~
This letter is published in full as it appeared in The Times as the author notes it has been edited from what he wrote.
If I told you that the first sentence of my letter was edited, your readers might be mollified.
I wrote:
Andrew Motion (report, Feb 23) is correct to castigate climate change deniers, as the climate has always been changing, but he is profoundly mistaken in linking all those who oppose the current climate science orthodoxy into one group.
Michael Kelly
WATTS UP WITH THAT
Subscription required to access letter via the Times
CSaP Cambridge Center For Science and Policy
1 comments:
Do you have any figures concerning the number of turbines BP has abandoned? Or does BP sellout to another company prior to abandonment?
Post a Comment