Monday, February 11, 2013

Windpower Propaganda: Is closer than you may think


  A story posted today in Master Resource highlights the use of our Federal and State tax dollars to Green Wash school children.  This story hits home with our community and the BP/Trieste/ Voter for Wind trinity, working tirelessly to bring our community into green submission.  
 The popularization of wind power for children is all part of maintaining the huge appetites of a corrupt parasitical green machine. In the above referenced website (Wind Powering America) the author admits that the programs they espouse are also addressing “opposition to wind” or as they call it “addressing public resistance.”
 The local connection~
 January 22, 2013, at a work session Town Councilman Clif Schneider asked project developer Richard Chandler and BP lawyer Harris about what he called their shadow outreach. Specifically what he asked about was BP's involvement in lawsuits, one against the Town of Lyme and one against two local bloggers.

Mr. Schneider noted that in 2008 a group of land owners filed a lawsuit against the town of Lyme because they felt that Lyme's law effectively banned the development of wind-generating facilities within the town.  

Next Mr. Schneider asked about BP’s involvement with a current lawsuit against Cape's two bloggers, Pandora's Box of Rocks and Jefferson Leaning Left.

 Councilman Schneider pointed out that
 In their PIP, BP established an explicit connection between themselves Trieste Associates and Voters for Wind.

 “In 2007, BP retained the services of Trieste Associates and the company’s team of public outreach experts to assist with planning events to educate and engage the public. As part of this effort, BP assisted a group of local wind power supporters in the Towns of Cape Vincent and Lyme to form a group known as Voters for Wind.” Additionally Mr. Schneider cited a NYSERDA sponsored school curriculum  
  “Trieste Associates has helped citizens organize groups such as Voters for Wind in New York that educates the public about the benefits of renewable energy resources. Voters for Wind filed and won a law suit against the elected officials who voted to prohibit a wind farm in the Town of Lyme, New York.”

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cape Vincent

Keep your jackknife sharpened and some day you will get to use it.

Just a hundred miles from you 60 Middleville, Fairfield and Norway residents (And the list is growing) have filed a lawsuit in state Supreme Court against the entities responsible for its construction, namely Iberdrola Renewables and the sound expert who apparently gave the wrong information.

Keep a record of all the information given to you by Bp, Trieste Associates and Voters for Wind. Every wind farm built so far has caused problems. In Cape Vincent you have many locals claiming to be experts and have presented company standards as facts.

Cape Vincent is just as vulnerable if not more so than Fairfield, etc.

Anyone who delivers bad information that later causes others to lose home value, lifestyle and health can be held liable and a complaint filed.

Keep good records and keep up the good work.

Anonymous said...

Nice lesson for our school kids. If a sleazy foreign corporation like BP doesn't like local laws, just pay locals to file lawsuits to help the corporation squash local law.

Anonymous said...

When the lawsuit against the bloggers and the hundreds of people who made comments on the blog comes to trial, it will give the law abiding citizens the opportunity to testify about the bad stuff voters for wind and fair government citizens have said and done to our freedoms.

I believe that the plaintiffs have falsely accused the bloggers and comment makers of depriving the past councilman of their public office. I think they should be made to pay for bearing false witness against thy neighbor.

That is why I support the:

Blogger's Defense Fund

Box 8

Three Mile Bay, NY 13693

Anonymous said...

Nice lesson to teach the kids in school...

It is ok to have a financial conflict of interest and vote your interest while in government?

Even though the SCOTUS a short time ago ruled against a town council member who voted for a project favorable to his business partner.