February 22, 2013
Honorable Jeffrey C. Cohen
Acting Secretary, NYS Board of Electric Power
Generation Siting and Environment
Three Empire State Plaza
Albany, New York 12223-1350
Re: Case 12-F-0410 Cape Vincent Wind Power, LLC
Dear Secretary Cohen:
The Town of Cape Vincent has been struggling with how to best ensure that all of the potentially
negative environmental, health, safety and welfare issues are properly and thoroughly addressed
by BP in their Preliminary Scoping Statement.
To date our attempts to identify and discuss issues with BP were unsuccessful. Whenever we
sought answers, responses from BP generally do not come at all. On those few occasions when
BP representatives came to our town, their responses to even our most basic inquiries were
dismissive, evasive and impatient in their tone. Our concern is that BP’s inattention in the past
will carry over into their Preliminary Scoping Statement that may overlook many of the potential
adverse impacts the Town has identified.
BP clearly understands the nature of our concerns as evidenced by the language included in their
so called Good Neighbor Agreement. In these agreements BP identified many of the potentially
adverse environmental impacts to landowners within and near the footprint of their project
proposal. However, for BP to act in their dealings with the Town as if these adverse impacts are
not pertinent, not relevant or untimely, shows no trace of good faith in their pretended public
involvement and public outreach effort here in Cape Vincent.
Please note the opening paragraph and first part of BP’s “Wind Farm Neighbor Easement
Agreement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenants” as shown below:
1. Wind Farm Operations Easement. Owner grants Grantee an exclusive easement in ,
on, over, across and through Owner’s Property, for the purpose of allowing any audio,
visual, view, light, noise, vibration, shadow, flicker, air turbulence, wake, ice,
electromagnetic, electric and radio interference, ice throw or other weather created
hazards or other effect of any kind whatsoever resulting directly or indirectly from
any construction, development, repair, maintenance, replacement, or operation of
Grantee’s Windpower Facilities or other of Grantee’s activities on the Wind Farm,
that could interfere with the Owner’s peaceful enjoyment and use of the Owner’s
Property.”
turbulence, wake, ice, electromagnetic, electric and radio interference, ice throw …” in their
agreement, BP identified these as significant adverse impacts that may negatively impact the
environment, health, safety and welfare of the “Owner” and therefore by inference the entire
community.
BP's Good Neighbor Agreement provides a far more comprehensive listing of potentially adverse
environmental impacts for Town of Cape Vincent residents than what BP describes in their revised and approved PIP. For example, their PIP identifies noise, shadow flicker, decreased property values and loss of wildlife and habitat as the only adverse impacts that should be discussed
with the Town. The town contends that BP's Preliminary Scoping Statement of potentially adverse impacts should be as complete and consistent as that which BP requires in the Good Neighbor agreements.
Our belief is that BP has no intention of being transparent and fully informative as they press
forward with this project. Their past history with us suggests this will be the case. Our request
of the Siting Board and case staff is for you to make every effort to insist that BP properly and
fully address each of the impact factors in their scoping statement that they expect their
cooperating landowners to wave.
Thank you for continued attention to our concerns.
Respectfully yours,
Urban Hirschey – Town Supervisor
Brooks Bragdon – Deputy Supervisor
John Byrne – Town Council
Clifford Schneider – Town Council
Michelle Oswald – Town Council
We the undersigned appointed officials from the Town of Cape Vincent endorse and
fully support this Town Board letter to the Public Service Commission regarding the
Article 10 application for the Cape Vincent Wind Power project proposal.
Richard Macsherry – Planning Board Chairman
Robert Brown – Planning Board
Cyril Cullen – Planning Board
Paul Docteur – Planning Board
R. Dennis Faulknham – Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman
Ed Hludzenski – Zoning Board of Appeals
Keith Walker – Zoning Board of Appeals
Hester Chase – Zoning Board of Appeals
James Millington – Zoning Enforcement Officer
4 comments:
Good neighbor?
To bee pee maybe. Not to their former cape friends and family.
It is my understanding that neither a land owner nor a developer can craft and enforce their own variance. What were the good neighbors thinking when they signed those agreements? Hey, sure pay me some money and I will sign my rights away?
It is very likely that those people at the town meetings who are digging up dirt, suing and trying to make anti wind look bad are being rewarded for reporting back to the community organizer.
Correct me if I am wrong. did BP list the TI schools as a contacted stakeholder? They are a taxing jurisdiction that might vote on a PILOT. The school will have a lot of explaining to do if they approve of giving BP any breaks. As a life long CV person I will start voting against the district budgets if they support BP in ruining my property values.
Post a Comment