Sec. 2.6.1
Setback Requirements and/or Recommendations- Applicant Specifications
"Noise studies should be conducted pursuant to Town of Cape
Vincent Zoning Law Section 6.7 and any noise mitigation plans
must be submitted along with the application."
2.19 Noise and Vibration (1001.19 Exhibit 19: Noise and Vibration) (pp.68-73)
1. The scope of studies should provide details including the
criteria to be used for selection of background and ambient noise level
measurement locations and identification of proposed sampling or measurement
locations.
2. Tonal noise analysis mentioned at 2.19.1 (pg. 68) and
2.19.3 (at 5th bullet) should be performed for the proposed substation as well
as for wind turbines. High voltage transformers are likely to exhibit tonal
characteristics during operations. The scope should identify the analysis methodology,
definitions and terminology, and applicable standards for performing the tonal
characteristics analysis.
3. Noise analysis of wind turbines
should be based on turbine model(s) selected for installation at the project.
The PSS statements about turbine models being selected at some future time is
problematic for modeling noise emissions, predicting tonal character, and
making findings regarding probable environmental impacts. Staff recommends that
CVWP provide additional information regarding its proposal for studying turbine
and project impacts of unspecified turbine make or model and provide more
complete characterization of the classes of turbines under consideration, the
range of turbine make(s) and model(s) within those classes, and representative
data to demonstrate that it‟s proposal is responsible and will result in
credible record information. Staff recommends that follow-up discussions be
planned to address this and related topics with interested parties in
attendance before the applicant advances to final scoping or application
phases.
4. The scope of Noise and Vibration studies
should be revised to include:
(a) a glossary of terminology and
abbreviations used, so there is no misunderstanding by reviewing agencies or
parties; and,
(b) copies of any reference standards that
will be relied upon in study methodologies.
5. The position stated in section 2.19.3 at
the second bullet that, “there are no plans at this time to carry out a survey
of background sound levels during summertime conditions” as per the regulations
at 16 NYCRR 1001.19(b), (f)(2) and (f)(5), will require that the applicant
request a waiver from the application requirements.
6. The PSS should be supplemented with a
description of the scope and methodology that will be used to develop and
perform the “evaluation of construction sound levels at potentially impacted
and representative noise receptors” (Section 2.19.3, at third bullet). Describe
how representative noise receptors will be selected and indicate specific
representative receptors that may have already been selected or studied to
support the application. This selection of representative noise receptor
locations should include consideration of interested parties.
7. The PSS does not specifically address any intent to study or
otherwise address low-frequency noise or vibration. Staff advises that the
applicant should propose a scope of studies to demonstrate a responsible
approach to analyzing potential health impacts of low-frequency sound and
vibration, including a thorough literature review, analysis of background
conditions, report on the current known state of scientific analysis ongoing
at the time of application, and provide an analysis of potential
project effects in the project study area. Original study analyzing reported
problems of low-frequency or infrasound and relation of problem locations to
operating wind energy projects is recommended, including reporting on potential
health effects.
2 comments:
Voters for Wind were more than willing to allow 50 Decibel. They went public with it in their wind law participation. Their suggesting was pulled from a green bag and was the same that Madden brought to the wind lease conflicted planning board. If such a sound level is forced upon our town and does not work out, hopefully the voters for wind and past wind lease holding officials who approved what now is some of Bee Pee's work will be held legally accountable. Remember that two town board conflicted wind lease holders tried to impeach Urban Hirschey because he released documents that showed hanky panky regarding the noise issue. Voters for
Wind were in on that one, too. If Bee Pee does steamroll our community the Cape will become one big gold mine for the legal profession. Perhaps someone should start a business in Cape Vincent serving claims.
Every agency commenting thus far has completely supported our town officials and committees. That should say something to the pro wind and the pro wind Democrats and Citizens for Fair Government who think they should take back the Cape and give it to British Petroleum.
Post a Comment