The latest Wolfe
Island Wind Project post construction Bird and Bat Mortality Monitoring report
indicated an annual bird mortality rate of 0.77 birds/ MW for the Period of January -June 2012 . This is lower than that observed at the nearby Maple Ridge
facility
A Bird's eye view of Wolfe Island |
Evans, who was hired
by the Prince Edward County Field Naturalists to study the potential impact of
the project on bird mortality, recently gave his testimony to a tribunal in that county .
“I discovered that there has been considerable underestimation of fatalities reported to the public by the Wolfe Island wind project,”
Evans said.
“In my tribunal
testimony, I noted a discrepancy between positions taken by the Ontario
Ministry of Natural Resources(OMNR) and Environment Canada regarding the distance of
carcasses (that) land from the base of a wind turbine.”
OMNR states in their Dec 2011 publication Birds and Bird Habitats: Guidelines for Wind Power Projects that “most bird carcasses fall within 50 m” while Environment Canada states in their 2007 publication Recommended Protocols for Monitoring Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds wind energy guidelines that “most carcasses fall within 80 m”. While I testified that OMNR may be technically correct in that more than 50% fall within a 50 m radius of the Wolfe Island Wind Project (WIWP) wind turbines, I noted this is misleading in not specifying that a substantial portion fall beyond the 50 m survey zone. I presented evidence from the fatality study at the Maple Ridge Wind Project, 70 km to the southeast of WIWP in New York indicating that 40% of small birds fall in that study’s most distant survey zone 50-80 m radius from the wind turbine base. The numbers of bird carcasses that are lofted beyond 80 m are largely unknown but thought to be relatively small. I also noted that the NY wind turbines were an older, smaller variety – the WIWP wind turbines are taller with blade tips traveling over 200 km/hr, so one would anticipate small bird carcasses whacked even further.
OMNR states in their Dec 2011 publication Birds and Bird Habitats: Guidelines for Wind Power Projects that “most bird carcasses fall within 50 m” while Environment Canada states in their 2007 publication Recommended Protocols for Monitoring Impacts of Wind Turbines on Birds wind energy guidelines that “most carcasses fall within 80 m”. While I testified that OMNR may be technically correct in that more than 50% fall within a 50 m radius of the Wolfe Island Wind Project (WIWP) wind turbines, I noted this is misleading in not specifying that a substantial portion fall beyond the 50 m survey zone. I presented evidence from the fatality study at the Maple Ridge Wind Project, 70 km to the southeast of WIWP in New York indicating that 40% of small birds fall in that study’s most distant survey zone 50-80 m radius from the wind turbine base. The numbers of bird carcasses that are lofted beyond 80 m are largely unknown but thought to be relatively small. I also noted that the NY wind turbines were an older, smaller variety – the WIWP wind turbines are taller with blade tips traveling over 200 km/hr, so one would anticipate small bird carcasses whacked even further.
I noted that the Ostrander wind
turbines (142.5 m agl) would be even larger than those on Wolfe Island with a
1000+ m 2 greater rotor-swept area, yet the fatality study protocol
approved by both OMNR and EC still only involves surveys out to 50 m.
It is difficult for me to believe
that the biologists at OMNR and EC who reviewed the post-construction bird
& bat monitoring plant for the Ostrander project do not understand that
these larger turbines will launch songbird carcasses much further than the
smaller turbines at the Maple Ridge project, and that more than half of the
small birds may land beyond the 50 m search radius. This appears tantamount to
a cover-up, but I have no direct evidence.
Link below for the latest WIWF Bird & Bat mortality monitoring report
Sources:
Having TransAlta conduct bird and bat fatality studies to document wildlife loss is like asking convicted drunk drivers on parole to report any drunken driving episodes during their parole period. Who would believe anything either of them reported? There has to be a better system? How about an operator puts the monitoring money in an escrow account and then a natural resource agency administers the funds, hires the consultants and releases the reports - all at the expense of the wind operator.
ReplyDeleteA voter for wind in a public meeting once said that there was no problem with bird kills on Wolfe Island.
ReplyDeleteShe said the head honcho at TransAlta told her during a Voter for Wind visit to the Island that they shut the turbines down during the migration. The audience and public officials were very respectful and did not laugh.