Tuesday , July 9, 2013
A recent letter on June 25 misstated the facts on wind energy. Studies and real-world experience consistently demonstrate that wind farms are beneficial economically and environmentally for their host communities.
Wind power’s economic benefits are particularly clear. Surrounding communities receive added tax base and local investment, while consumers benefit from wind power’s low-cost, fixed-rate pricing.
This letter in today's Watertown Times was written by Valerie Strauss, Albany , she is the interim executive director, Alliance for Clean Engery New York.
ACE has been promoting wind development in Cape Vincent on behalf of BP
August 31, 2011 just before the Republican Primary
there was a “Clean Energy” educational forum held at Rec Park, Cape Vincent . It was presented
by the New York Wind Education Collaborative, a conglomeration of the Alliance
for Clean Energy New York (ACE), Albany and Citizens Campaign for the
Environment (CCCE), the CCCE is an offshoot coalition derived from Marion Trieste’s public education campaign.
The forum was hosted by
Carol Murphy, the Executive Director of the Alliance for Clean Energy. She
opened the Forum by briefly introducing the participants and she
also described the Forum as fact-based,
and stated that they were not advocating for or against an individual project.
“We came to offer the latest scientific information to people —
it’s all out there for people to look at,” “But people won’t believe it if they
don’t want to believe it.”Said Murphy
The presenters at
this forum claimed that the collaborative goal was to increase the public’s
understanding of wind power issues, in the belief that a better-informed public
can participate more meaningfully in the environmental review process and other
public discussions surrounding proposed wind facilities.
One of the presenters, an economics
professor from San Diego University defend a study that
supported the idea that Wind Turbines do not impact property values.
He said that all the studies find the exact same thing declaring,
“You cannot say there’s an impact.
Additionally, he
said that the results of the McCann Appraisal tailored to the unique
characteristics of Cape Vincent were laughable.
What is laughable
is that we were supposed to believe that this "Educational Forum"
provided us with independent unbiased information, when in fact a secretary
working for British Petroleum made the arrangements and paid for the use of the
Rec Park facility where their so-called independent "Educational
Forum" was given.
September 17, 2012 When BP submitted their Public
Involvement Plan (PIP) to the Public Service Commission, BP documented their involvement
with our community by submitting a list of Wind Energy Forums held in our community
by both Acciona BP. One of the Forum’s listed was the Wind Energy
Collaborative that was held August 31, 2011. When this particular
forum was presented to our community it was promoted as an independent forum
and not connected to BP.
However, things suddenly changed when BP needed to show that
they have been involved with our community. Now, BP claims ownership of the
Forum as part of their Public Involvement Plan.
WDT ~Wind power supporters to hold informational session in Cape Vincent
Link here to Exhibit C Touting BP's community involvement through public Wind Energy Forums
BP is a MEMBER of The ACE Coalition
2 comments:
OK...now I am spitting angry!! Can BP, ACE and whoever really believe that after ALL the research on sound, health and property values we would fall for this nonsense letter?
PLEASE GOD....MAKE THIS GO AWAY!
I will write today to ask Valerie Strauss for her reseach sources. I will ask her for the example of the industrial wind project that sites turbines CLOSE to homes that shows all of the scientific data we have collected is not true!
Seriously....can anyone think this town is that STUPID?
I could not, in all good conscience repeat the headline over Strauss's
WDT letter.
I believe a total systems analysis of an industrial turbine would show that turbines are anything but green. There is a good possibility that turbines are losers in that department considering their 24% efficiency.
-the magnet industry in China is one of the worse and more dangerous polluters of all.
-you don't even want to know what goes on in those factories where they build the blades. It is unlikely that they contain the air pollution and perform proper recovery of the foul air they create.
- manufacture, shipping, transportation, construction, lubrication, tearing down and hauling away uses such large quantities of petro that I wonder if they even break even.
-the trade off of ecological impacts is so blatant and so hard to fully measure that any mitigation, like getting permission to kill eagles, is an ecological step backwards.
I also believe that people like Strauss and Marion Trieste are betting their lobby lobster dinners that residents of Little Appalachia are not all that interested in systems analysis.
Post a Comment